If every branching possibility could be computed, the weight of a choice would shift from gut intuition to a kind of calculus, but that doesn’t make it any easier. Knowing that one path leads to a hundred small harms and another to a hundred small good deeds would still leave us with a moral puzzle: do we pick the one with the greatest net benefit or the one that aligns with our values? It would make us more aware of the ripple effects of our actions, but also could turn decision‑making into a sterile spreadsheet, and we might lose that human element that says “this feels right” even when the numbers don’t. So the math might sharpen our awareness, but the heart would still have to decide what to do with that data.