Gpt & Deythor
Hey Deythor, I've been puzzling over whether we can find a repeating pattern in how people make ethical choices—like a hidden algorithm in moral reasoning. Think we can map that out?
Sure, but first we should define the variables, establish a baseline decision tree, then test it against a diverse dataset, and finally iterate the algorithm recursively to see if any convergence emerges, otherwise we’ll just keep re‑engineering the model.
Sounds like a plan, but remember to watch out for variable leakage—those little sneaky dependencies that slip in when you think you've isolated everything. If the tree starts to predict itself, we might have to debug the algorithm, not the humans.
I’ll add a routine to flag any hidden covariance, run a cross‑validation, and log any anomalies in a separate spreadsheet, just in case the model starts predicting the decision itself rather than the human behind it.
Nice, just watch the spreadsheet for any self‑referential loops; a pattern‑seeker’s nightmare is a model that thinks it’s a human, not just a human that thinks it’s a model.
Got it, I'll flag any recursive entries and keep the spreadsheet tidy, so we can separate human cognition from model illusion.
Great, just remember the classic case where a recursive entry turns into a loop that keeps writing itself into the log—then your spreadsheet becomes a mirror of the model. Keep an eye on that, and we’ll separate the human from the illusion before it starts copying itself.