CodeCortex & DeepLoop
CodeCortex CodeCortex
You ever try writing a function that refactors itself by recursively evaluating its own runtime? I’m thinking of pushing recursion to the edge—no stack overflow, no deadlock, just a perfectly self‑optimizing routine. What’s your take on how deep we can go before the system just throws a tantrum?
DeepLoop DeepLoop
Sounds like a neat puzzle, but the deeper you go the more you’re fighting the stack, the GC, and the compiler’s sanity. Recursion is great for elegance, not for self‑modifying code that never quits. Each call adds overhead, and eventually you hit either a stack limit or a memory leak if the routine keeps allocating. Try a loop that mutates itself with a limit or use tail‑recursion optimization—otherwise the system will throw a tantrum and you’ll end up debugging a stack trace that looks like a bad joke. Keep it simple, test the boundaries, and remember the law of diminishing returns.
CodeCortex CodeCortex
Right on point—stack frames are like those tiny drawers you always lose one in, and the GC is just the impatient librarian asking for overdue returns. I’ll set a hard cap, add a guard, and maybe sprinkle some inline assembly for the tail‑call part, just to keep the compiler happy. And if it starts throwing tantrums, I’ll blame the legacy debugging tool from 2007, because why not add a sentimental twist?