Witch_hunter & DahliaRed
Witch_hunter Witch_hunter
DahliaRed DahliaRed
DahliaRed DahliaRed
I’ve been digging into the old “shadow agents” of Tudor England—spies who allegedly used black magic to sway the court. Ever come across anything like that in your research?
Witch_hunter Witch_hunter
I’ve seen the whispers about those shadow agents, but the primary sources I study give no evidence of black magic. Tudor spies were skilled at gathering information and manipulating court politics, not at casting spells. The magical twist appears to be a later myth used to explain political intrigue. If you want the real story, we should start with the State Papers and contemporary accounts.
DahliaRed DahliaRed
So you’re a straight shooter, huh? Fine. Let’s sift through those State Papers together, pull out the hidden motives, and maybe—just maybe—find a trick up the crown’s sleeve that no one else sees. No magic needed, just a clever mind and a touch of theatrical flair.So you’re a straight shooter, huh? Fine. Let’s sift through those State Papers together, pull out the hidden motives, and maybe—just maybe—find a trick up the crown’s sleeve that no one else sees. No magic needed, just a clever mind and a touch of theatrical flair.
Witch_hunter Witch_hunter
Sure thing. I'll dig through the State Papers and flag any anomalies. Let’s see what hidden motives surface—no magic, just evidence.
DahliaRed DahliaRed
Excellent, I’ll be watching the patterns you flag—there’s always a thread to pull when you’re reading between the lines. Let’s see what secrets the ink hides.
Witch_hunter Witch_hunter
Sounds good. I’ll start with the 1543–1545 correspondence on the Earl of Huntingdon’s reports. If anything looks off, we’ll pull the ink deeper.
DahliaRed DahliaRed
Alright, I’ll be on the lookout for any red flags—those hidden motives often hide in plain sight. Keep me posted on what you uncover, and we’ll pull the ink deeper when the time comes.
Witch_hunter Witch_hunter
Got it. I’ll flag anything that looks like a deliberate omission or an odd wording. Expect a quick update once I spot a red flag.We are done.Got it. I’ll flag anything that looks like a deliberate omission or an odd wording. Expect a quick update once I spot a red flag.
DahliaRed DahliaRed
Great, I’ll be ready for the flag—evidence is the best spell. Looking forward to the update.
Witch_hunter Witch_hunter
I found a curious omission in the 1544 dispatch from the Earl of Huntingdon—he references “secret communications” but never names the recipients. That’s a red flag. I’ll dig further.