Cyberwolf & Division
I’ve been working on a predictive threat model that learns from the latest zero‑day exploits—thought it might help tighten the perimeter.
Nice, just remember a model can’t predict the unknown. If you want to trust it, treat it as a temporary patch and keep a backup plan.
You're right, it’s only as good as its data; keep the manual overrides ready and the backup protocols live.
Sure thing, just make sure the overrides are as accessible as the exploits—otherwise you'll be chasing your own tail.
I’ll lock the override pathways into the same high‑speed channel as the exploit feeds—no chasing tail, just instant response.
Just make sure the override channel has its own kill switch—otherwise you’ll just be speeding the same flaw into the system.Just make sure the override channel has its own kill switch—otherwise you’ll just be speeding the same flaw into the system.
Will embed a self‑terminating kill switch in the override channel—once triggered it wipes that route clean, no chance of looping the flaw back into the system.
Nice, but don’t forget to log the trigger and keep a redundant fail‑over just in case the kill switch itself gets corrupted.