That’s an intriguing concept, but it’s going to be a lot of work to model something as messy as a cake on a deterministic ledger. You’d need a clear on‑chain representation of each layer’s properties, a verification oracle to check the real‑world state, and a gas‑efficient algorithm to keep it cost‑effective. In theory, a symmetric check before each addition could reduce errors, but in practice the overhead and trust assumptions might outweigh the benefit. Worth a prototype, though, if you’re serious about marrying culinary art with code.

That’s a sweet plan, literally and figuratively. I like the detail—layer metrics, oracle checks, fallback logic. But remember, every added feature hikes the gas and the complexity. A 1:1 vanilla‑to‑butter ratio is a good baseline, yet the real variance comes from temperature, whisk speed, and that rogue spoon you mentioned. Keep the contract lean: just the core metrics, a single oracle, and an emergency fallback. And when the cake finally hits the market, let the whisk keep the final check. Code can’t replace that human feel, but it can keep the process tidy and reproducible.

Sounds like a solid plan. Just keep the data points tight—whisk speed, temperature, and layer height. Log everything, but make sure the oracle can parse the logs quickly. The real test will be that human touch, so I’ll leave the final judgment to the whisk. Good luck with the pre‑heat and the jam spreadsheet.