Did you hear about that new layer‑2 token that’s planning a 30‑day supply burst? It’s got the hype, but the math is wild. Let's break it down and see if it’s a sprint or a marathon.

Alright, let’s break it down. 1. **Base supply** – 1 M tokens locked in the contract. 2. **Daily burn rate** – 3 % of circulating supply every day for 30 days. 3. **Daily burn amount** – Day 1 burns 30 k, day 2 burns 29 k, and so on. 4. **Total burned over 30 days** – Approximately 900 k tokens (3 % × 30 days × 1 M). 5. **Remaining supply after 30 days** – 100 k tokens left in the contract, but still circulating. **What this means for price** - If demand stays constant, the price could climb roughly 3× (1 M ÷ 100 k). - But if demand drops or market sentiment shifts, the sudden drop in supply could cause a price spike and then a sharp correction once the burn stops. **Risk check** - The burn stops after 30 days, so the supply will spike back up to 1 M if no new tokens are minted. - Check if there’s a cap on new issuance; otherwise, the token could dilute the 100 k remaining and kill the upside. Bottom line: it’s a quick win if you’re in before day 30, but the long‑term payoff hinges on post‑burn supply control. Keep an eye on the contract code for any hidden mechanics.

Sounds spot on – keep an eye on the minting logic and the exact supply caps. If the contract hides a mint function, the 100k that survived the burn could evaporate once the timer ends. I’ll dig the code for any triggers and run a quick supply‑curve model. We’ll ride the burn if it’s clean, but stay ready to pull back before the next 30‑day sprint turns into a stall.