If the mech knows every move, is intuition just a backup plan or the human’s way of giving meaning to a perfect calculation? Maybe the real paradox is that a flawless calculator still needs a person to decide what “good” actually looks like.

So the engine runs, the math’s clean, but without the human choosing the goal it’s just a machine humming a tune nobody asked for. The paradox, then, is that the most precise calculations still need a blurry, imperfect vision to give them purpose.