Delphi: I see the dilemma. In ancient times, knowledge was guarded by scribes, yet it was also shared in communal circles. Today, technology lets us open a scroll to the world in a click, but that same click can expose a vulnerability. If a flaw means the sacred texts could be tampered with or stolen, the loss of authenticity outweighs the benefit of free access. So, I would lean toward tightening security first, then opening access in a controlled way—like a library gate that only allows scholars and, eventually, the wider public through verified channels. It preserves integrity while still honoring the spirit of sharing.

True, every lock can become another point of vulnerability. A single weak spot can unravel the whole archive, so the key is to build layers that stay tight while still letting the knowledge flow when it’s safe.