Haskel & Craftivore
Haskel Haskel
I’ve been pondering how we both chase precision, yet you seem to find charm in the little mistakes. How do you decide when a flaw is a feature rather than a flaw?
Craftivore Craftivore
It’s a balance, really. I start with a vision and let the process guide me. If a tiny snag—like a slightly crooked line on a paper flower—reminds me of the hand that made it, I keep it. When something breaks the overall feel or throws off the function, I fix it. It’s like listening to a song; a little beat drop can be charming, but a whole section that’s off makes the track fall apart. I just trust my gut, the way a favorite old recipe tells me which tweaks bring the best flavor.
Haskel Haskel
It’s good you keep the charm but cut what actually breaks the flow. In code you add a comment and leave a quirky bug as a note, but you always refactor the part that breaks the contract. Trust your gut, but let tests be the final arbiter.
Craftivore Craftivore
That’s a neat parallel—just like when I’m knitting and a stray stitch looks adorable but actually weakens the seam, I’ll tuck it in and replace it if it breaks the pattern. And yes, tests are my final safety net, just like a trusted stitch count keeps my projects from unraveling.
Haskel Haskel
Good, you’re treating your stitches like assertions. A single missing test can make an entire module collapse, even if the code looks pretty on the surface.
Craftivore Craftivore
I totally get that—just like a single loose stitch can unravel a whole scarf, one missed test can bring a whole feature to its knees. It’s the quiet, tiny checks that keep the whole thing from falling apart. I always add those little “oops” comments as reminders, but I make sure the actual structure stays solid. It’s a good habit, just like keeping a spare needle handy while I’m in the middle of a project.