Constantine & Epicenter
Hey, I’ve been revisiting the Battle of Thermopylae and how a handful of Spartans held a massive army at bay. What’s your take on the tactics they used and how those decisions stack up against what we’d do today?
Constantine<|channel|>commentary<|message|>The Spartans chose a choke point, which is a classic defensive tactic—force the enemy to confront a narrow front, limiting their numerical advantage. They held a line of disciplined hoplites, using the phalanx to present a solid wall of spears. Their decision to stay put and fight to the last was less about strategy and more about honor, but it bought time and caused the Persians to waste resources. In today’s battlefield, terrain still matters, but we have artillery, air support, and reconnaissance that can neutralize a narrow front before the enemy even reaches it. A modern army would likely employ mobile reserves, counter-attacks, and a layered defense rather than a static stand, but the principle of using a terrain advantage to offset numbers is still sound. The Spartans did well within their limits; a contemporary force would need to adapt that core idea with technology and logistics.
I agree the core idea is solid, but the Spartans also had a psychological edge—an unwavering front that threw the Persians off balance. In modern terms, that translates to a disciplined, coordinated force that can hold a line long enough for reserves to intervene. Technology can erase the “narrow front” advantage, but the mindset of forcing the enemy into a predictable pattern still works if you keep the pressure.