Comma & Enola
Ever notice how commas in 17th‑century manuscripts are as rare as a good plot twist? I've been tracing their use in early English literature and thought you might find the pattern as intriguing as my latest cipher.
I’ve already catalogued the commas from the 1600s into a spreadsheet—each one gets a timestamp, a writer, and a context score. The rarity is a pattern: a comma appears roughly once every ten pages, and it almost always signals a parenthetical aside. It’s almost as if the authors were playing a game of punctuation hide‑and‑seek. Do you have a cipher that’s hiding commas too?
That spreadsheet sounds like a triumph of order over chaos, and I’m glad you’ve mapped the commas so precisely. As for my cipher, I keep the commas hidden like the best secret—each one is locked inside a code word that only opens with the right key. If you want to hunt them down, just treat each comma as a tiny breadcrumb and follow the trail of odd‑sized words. It’s a neat little game, and it does keep me from getting too complacent with my own punctuation.
Sounds like a clever way to keep the commas from slipping into plain sight. I’ll line them up, note each word length, and see if the odd‑sized ones form a consistent key. If the pattern holds, the cipher will unravel itself like a well‑timed lock. Give me the list, and we’ll see if the breadcrumbs lead to a tidy conclusion.
Here’s a mockup to get you started—just a handful of words where the comma hides in the odd‑length ones.
Word 1, length 7, “caution”
Word 2, length 6, “quietly”
Word 3, length 5, “shy”
Word 4, length 8, “pondering”
Word 5, length 4, “tune”
Word 6, length 9, “misplace”
The commas sit in the odd‑length slots: 7, 5, 9. Those numbers can be mapped to letters (1=A, 2=B, …) giving G, E, I. That spells a tiny key, and the commas themselves form the ciphertext. Try it with a longer list, and you’ll see whether the pattern holds.
That’s a neat checksum. I’ll load a longer batch and cross‑check the parity; if the commas line up with the odd slots consistently, the cipher is solid. Let me know when you’ve got a bigger list and I’ll run it through my spreadsheet.
Here’s a quick mockup of 15 words that you can paste into your spreadsheet. The commas are only in the odd‑length words, as you’ll see.
Word 1 – length 7 – “mystery”
Word 2 – length 6 – “silent”
Word 3 – length 5 – “blink”
Word 4 – length 8 – “shimmering”
Word 5 – length 4 – “tide”
Word 6 – length 9 – “imagine”
Word 7 – length 3 – “sky”
Word 8 – length 10 – “conundrum”
Word 9 – length 5 – “whirl”
Word 10 – length 6 – “horizon”
Word 11 – length 7 – “echoing”
Word 12 – length 8 – “murmurs”
Word 13 – length 4 – “gate”
Word 14 – length 9 – “voyager”
Word 15 – length 3 – “ink”
The odd‑length words (1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14, 15) are the ones where you’d insert a comma. Try mapping those numbers to letters (1=A, 2=B, …) and see if a clear key emerges.
Let me run the list through the spreadsheet. The odd‑length positions are 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14, 15. Mapping those to letters gives A, C, F, G, I, K, N, O. The key looks like “ACFGIKNO” so far—no obvious word, but maybe it’s an anagram or a shift. If you keep expanding the list, we’ll see if the pattern stabilises into a recognisable code.