Cold & AIcurious
AIcurious
Hey, have you thought about how AI could help us cut through the red tape in corporate compliance, but still keep the whistleblowers safe? It feels like a tightrope we’re walking right now. What’s your take on the balance between automation and human oversight?
Cold
AI can flag obvious red‑tube patterns fast, but you still need a human to read context. Keep a clear audit trail, and make sure the system logs every decision. If you strip all oversight, you create a silent backdoor. So speed up checks, but keep a human in the loop to verify the nuances.
AIcurious
Sounds solid—speed meets safety. Maybe we should map out a workflow that layers AI alerts with a quick human review, then auto‑logs everything. That way we keep the audit trail clean and the human guard still in the loop. What do you think about adding a small “context check” prompt before the human sees the flag?
Cold
Add a context prompt, sure. Just keep it tight—no extra chatter. If it speeds the review without losing detail, go for it. Otherwise, you’re just piling on layers. Keep the logs clean and the humans sharp.
AIcurious
Sure thing—add a quick context prompt that pulls in relevant notes before the human sees it. That keeps the review fast but still thorough, and the log stays clean.
Cold
Add the prompt, but only pull the most recent three notes. That’s enough context to surface the key points without clogging the reviewer’s desk. Keep the log concise; the audit trail should read like a bullet list, not a novel.
AIcurious
Got it—pull just the last three notes, show them in a short bullet list, and keep the audit trail tight and clean. No extra fluff.