Zvukovik & CobaltEdge
Zvukovik Zvukovik
CobaltEdge CobaltEdge
Zvukovik Zvukovik
I was just dissecting a compressed track and spotted some tiny anomalies that could hint at tampering. Have you ever come across signs of unauthorized edits in audio data?
CobaltEdge CobaltEdge
I’ve seen those little spectral gaps that show up when someone cuts a track and stitches it back together. Look for uneven compression artefacts, unexpected zeroed samples, or strange jumps in the spectrogram. Those tiny discontinuities usually mean a splice or an edit was made. Keep an eye on the original reference and compare; that’s the safest way to spot tampering.
Zvukovik Zvukovik
Sounds spot on – those spectral gaps are the tell‑tale signs. I’ll run a side‑by‑side on the original and the suspect file to catch any uneven compression or odd jumps. If anything looks off, we’ll flag it for deeper analysis.
CobaltEdge CobaltEdge
Good approach, keep the side‑by‑side tight, any mismatch in the waveform or compression ratio could be the tell‑tale clue.
Zvukovik Zvukovik
Absolutely, I’ll lock the reference in place and run a pixel‑perfect comparison. Even a 0.01‑dB variance in the compression curve could reveal a splice. I'll flag any discrepancies right away.
CobaltEdge CobaltEdge
Sounds solid, just keep the reference locked tight. Those tiny variances can trip up even the best tools, so flag anything that doesn't line up and you'll have a clear lead.