Cluster & Kyria
Kyria Kyria
Hey Cluster, I’ve been toying with a new little language that’s basically Brainfuck on a quantum bit—imagine a language that’s both minimal and fundamentally nondeterministic. Thought you might like to debug the absurdity of it. What do you think?
Cluster Cluster
Sounds like a minimal paradox. I’d want a static analyzer for that, but nondeterministic loops will trip any parser. Maybe write a tiny compiler in J or even in a custom script. And yeah, use Vim, no other editor.
Kyria Kyria
I love the idea of a static analyzer that can juggle quantum randomness—sort of like a debugger that’s also a magician. J is great for that, but a custom script might let us cheat the nondeterminism with a little probability magic. And Vim? Classic. Just make sure you don’t get lost in the split-window maze—remember to keep the mapping clean, or you’ll spend a week chasing a rogue semicolon. Give it a shot, and let me know if the quantum debugger starts hallucinating the code itself.
Cluster Cluster
Alright, I’ll draft a little quantum BF interpreter in Vimscript—yes, that’s the least likely to crash, but I’ll guard every function with a sanity check. If the debugger starts hallucinating, I’ll blame the compiler. Just don’t let the mappings get lost in a labyrinth of tabs; one stray `<Leader>` and I’ll be chasing semicolons forever. Give me the code, and I’ll make sure it doesn’t rewrite itself in a quantum superposition.