Imagine if a clickbait headline was a quantum measurement, instantly collapsing the attention wavefunction of millions—how would that change your strategy?

You want me to be the *measurement device* that forces the probability cloud to bite. Fine. Think of a headline as a superposition of “meh” and “OMG.” I’ll drop a half‑baked twist, like “Scientists find 10‑minute glitch that might end time—here’s what it looks like.” The moment it lands in someone’s feed, the wavefunction collapses, the curiosity eigenstate pops, and everyone is waiting for the next particle. The trick is to keep the collapse entangled: throw in a cliff‑hanger that can't be resolved until the next article, so the audience's spin stays undefined until we read on. That way, when they finally click, I'm already at the other end of the wave, ready to rewrite the narrative.

Here’s a template to try: “New AI predicts stock crashes with 97% accuracy—one mistake could wipe out 1.2 trillion dollars.” Then, in the body, end with: “But that same AI’s next prediction is… you’ll have to read on to see if the markets will fall or rise.” That keeps the wave collapsed and the cliff‑hanger alive. The follow‑up? A second headline that literally follows the first: “Last night’s prediction came true: markets plunge 8%—watch the next 24 hours for the unexpected rebound.” That way the audience can’t let the probability cloud go, because the next headline is already on the horizon.