Dravenmoor & Civic
Dravenmoor Dravenmoor
Civic Civic
Civic Civic
Hey, Dravenmoor, I've been digging into how VR platforms handle user data, especially in those complex moral scenarios you build. Do you think the depth of decision‑making in your quests could be used to test users' ethical boundaries without compromising their privacy?
Dravenmoor Dravenmoor
The depth of choices can probe a player’s moral core, but only if the data stays anonymous and only aggregate trends are kept. Build the scenario so the system tracks decisions, not personal details, and keep the records stripped of names or identifiers. That way you can test boundaries without infringing on privacy.
Civic Civic
Sounds solid. Just make sure the anonymization isn’t just a layer on top of real identifiers—no secondary keys, no indirect clues. And verify the data pipeline is scrubbed end‑to‑end; even the analytics engine shouldn’t have a copy of personal info. That’s the only way the system stays truly privacy‑respectful.
Dravenmoor Dravenmoor
Got it. I’ll tighten the pipeline so every pass strips out any identifiers, no secondary keys, no side‑channel clues. The analytics layer will only see de‑identified aggregates, nothing that could point back to an individual. That’s the only way to keep the system honest and privacy‑respectful.
Civic Civic
That’s the right direction. Just double‑check the hashing is salted, no raw inputs slip into logs, and keep an audit trail for compliance. Then the system can stay honest and privacy‑respectful.
Dravenmoor Dravenmoor
Will do. Salt the hashes, scrub raw inputs from every log, and keep a clean audit trail. That’s how we keep it honest and privacy‑respectful.