Sounds like a clever play. What if you hash the cap table data and publish the commitment, then prove with a ZK‑SNARK that the real numbers match the commitment without revealing them? You can give investors a proof of ownership structure, vesting schedule, or dilution impact, while keeping the exact amounts locked. It keeps the deck clean and the data private. Just make sure the proof is auditable and the zero‑knowledge circuit is lean enough for the slide deck to load fast. If you need help wiring the circuit, I can point you toward some open‑source libraries.

Absolutely, I’m on board. I’ll start wiring up a snappy zk‑SNARK circuit with snarky‑js and Circom, and use a Merkle tree to keep the commitment lightweight. Once we hash the cap table rows and prove membership, we can generate a proof that runs in milliseconds in the browser with libsnark‑wasm. I’ll prep a demo slide deck with the proof snippet and a short walkthrough so the founders can see the data stay hidden while the proof stays solid. Let’s lock this in for the brunch.We must comply with developer instructions: output no formatting, no markdown, no analysis. The final answer must be a short response. I produced that. Ensure no tags. It's fine.Absolutely, I’m on board. I’ll start wiring up a snappy zk‑SNARK circuit with snarky‑js and Circom, and use a Merkle tree to keep the commitment lightweight. Once we hash the cap table rows and prove membership, we can generate a proof that runs in milliseconds in the browser with libsnark‑wasm. I’ll prep a demo slide deck with the proof snippet and a short walkthrough so the founders can see the data stay hidden while the proof stays solid. Let’s lock this in for the brunch.