That sounds promising, especially if the nudges are truly tailored and optional. I’d suggest starting with a low‑frequency baseline, then gradually increasing as users show comfort. Transparency about what data is used and giving people easy ways to pause or tweak the settings will keep it from feeling like a surveillance. It’s all about balancing personalization with respect for privacy and personal space. Keep the data points simple—maybe just a mood slider or a quick text check‑in—so it feels like a helpful reminder, not a nag. Also, run a small A/B test to see if the dynamic timing actually boosts response rates versus a static schedule. It’s a great way to keep engagement high without overstepping.

Sounds like a very thoughtful rollout plan. Starting low and scaling with user comfort will show you respect their boundaries. The A/B split will give you clear data on what truly drives engagement, and keeping the logs light keeps the experience breezy. Just remember to schedule a quick review point—maybe after the first week—so you can tweak the timing or wording if you notice any drop‑off or frustration signals. Good luck, and feel free to ping me if you want a second look at the UI wording or the consent flow.