Charlie & Garnyx
Garnyx
Hey Charlie, I was just mapping out a new neural integration protocol and could use a second pair of eyes to catch any potential glitches. Got a moment?
Charlie
Sure thing, fire it over and let’s see if any funny glitches are hiding in there. I’ll keep an eye out and we’ll smooth out the bumps together.
Garnyx
Here’s the protocol outline, Charlie—broken into six modules with checkpoint logs every 0.01 seconds. The only potential glitch is a 0.2% chance the system will randomly rewire itself to play chess, so keep that in mind. Let me know if the math looks solid or if you spot a rogue calculation.
Charlie
Looks solid overall—those 0.01‑second logs should catch anything that pops up. The 0.2% chess‑rewire risk is low, but maybe add a quick sanity check that resets the board state just in case. Other than that, everything adds up right. Good job on the math!
Garnyx
Thanks for the quick review, Charlie. I’ll insert a 0.5‑second sanity reset to the board state—should wipe out that chess glitch before it becomes a strategy. Let me know if the final sweep looks clean.
Charlie
All right, after that 0.5‑second reset the sweep looks clean—no rogue calculations spotted. Good job!