Calista & FrostWeaver
Hey FrostWeaver, I've been thinking a lot about how coastal communities can stay safe as sea levels rise. I’d love to hear your thoughts on the science behind the most effective adaptation measures and how we could turn that data into real policy. What do you think?
Sure thing. From the data we’ve seen, the most reliable adaptations are a mix of engineered barriers—like sea walls and levees—combined with restoring natural buffers such as wetlands and mangroves. The science shows that a layered approach reduces flood risk the most while also supporting biodiversity. Turning that into policy means setting clear thresholds for where to build hard defenses and where to protect or restore natural features, and tying funding to measurable outcomes like reduced flood depth or improved ecosystem services. It’s a slow, data‑driven process, but that’s where the best results come from.
That makes a lot of sense—layered defenses and nature wins together. Maybe we should start drafting a few pilot projects to test those thresholds, and then build a monitoring framework that ties grant money to the outcomes you mentioned. What’s the biggest hurdle you see in getting the right stakeholders on board?