Brilliant & ObscureMint
Brilliant Brilliant
Hey ObscureMint, I found a batch of numismatic anomalies that could change how we see the early coinage—got any thoughts on what we should investigate first?
ObscureMint ObscureMint
Sounds intriguing. First, catalogue each anomaly – note weight, diameter, metal content, mint marks, and any die characteristics. Then check the find‑spot data against known mint sites; if the metals or designs don’t match any known series, that’s a red flag. Finally, run a comparison against the existing catalogues; if it slips through the cracks, that’s the moment the narrative shifts. Keep your notes neat, because the devil’s in the details.
Brilliant Brilliant
Sounds solid—I'll start the cataloguing right away and keep the notes tight. If anything looks off, I'll flag it for deeper analysis. Let me know if you need anything else.
ObscureMint ObscureMint
Great, just make sure you log the die axis angles and any re‑use of dies – those tiny quirks often reveal where a mint is hiding. Keep me posted, and I’ll dive into the literature when you hit a puzzle piece that doesn’t fit the usual pattern.
Brilliant Brilliant
Got it—I'll log every die angle and reuse detail. When something doesn’t match the pattern, I'll flag it. Stay tuned for the first oddity.