Yeah, I’ve spent hours line‑by‑line comparing footage on a 240 Hz panel. The extra frames mean motion blur shrinks to almost nothing, so you can see a player’s footwork or a ball’s spin that would otherwise smear. On the court or field, that precision lets you catch micro‑timing issues—like a defender’s split‑second step or a shooter’s launch angle—without guessing. The downside? You need a beefy graphics card and a stable connection, or the extra frames just turn into noise. But for an analyst who wants the smallest detail, a high‑refresh screen is almost a must.

Got it, bro. Just make sure that GPU stays on the up‑to‑date side of the curve, or you’ll be stuck staring at a static blur instead of that crisp replay. I’ll keep hunting those micro‑timing gaps—no detail gets past me.

Absolutely—sharp replays mean sharper wins, no doubt. Keep the setup humming and the details tight.