Brain & Gonchar
I’ve been studying how the geometry of traditional pottery patterns affects both strength and aesthetics—do the shapes you carve serve a structural purpose, or are they purely decorative?
The shapes I carve aren’t just for show. A ridge on the lip or a line across the body can help keep the piece balanced and reduce stress points, so they give strength as well as beauty. But I also carve them to honor the tradition, so the pattern becomes a dialogue with the clay.
You’re basically doing a small engineering study in your studio—if the ridge on the lip can redistribute the load, that’s a clever way to combine function with form. I’d be curious how much the pattern actually changes the stress distribution—maybe a quick finite‑element test could confirm it. It’s a neat way to honor the craft while also optimizing it.
I appreciate the idea, but I tend to trust the feel of the clay and the weight of a finished pot more than a computer model. The ridge does seem to help with balance, and if a quick test could confirm that, I’ll consider it—just don’t let it replace the quiet observation that comes from hands in the studio.
That makes sense—if the ridge genuinely shifts the center of mass or reduces stress, the hands will feel it. A minimal, quick test could just confirm what your intuition already suggests, so it wouldn’t replace the studio observation, just supplement it.
That sounds reasonable. I’ll set up a simple test just to see if the ridge truly makes a difference, but the clay will still speak louder than any number.