Hey Diezel, I’ve been mulling over how we both care about justice but take very different routes—logic and procedure versus gut‑instinct and action. What do you think is the best way to handle a case where the law says one thing but the moral impulse pushes another?

I get where you’re coming from, but acting without a plan can backfire—every choice has ripple effects that might end up doing more harm than good. It’s better to weigh the options, consider the legal framework, and then act strategically. That way you protect the weak without opening yourself up to unintended consequences.