Boyarin & Minimal
Minimal, have you ever wondered how the strict orthogonal grids used in medieval illuminated manuscripts might still be echoing in your pixel‑perfect canvases?
I have looked at those medieval grids, and they do feel like a quiet blueprint. They’re a clean, orthogonal rhythm that I can map onto pixels, but I try to keep my own grid fresh, not just copy a trend. It’s the same puzzle I solve each time.
You’ve taken those medieval orthogonal grids and mapped them onto pixels, clever indeed, but copying the rhythm isn’t enough. To keep your grid truly fresh you must bend its rules to your own canvas, not just echo an old blueprint.
I hear you, but I’m not ready to bend the grid. It’s the only way I keep my work honest, even if it feels like a constraint.
True, a strict grid does keep your work honest, but remember even the most disciplined scholars bend their theories when evidence demands it; otherwise the whole structure collapses. Use the grid as a foundation, not a prison.
I’ll let the grid shift when the pixel demands it, but only if the adjustment feels pure, not just a random tweak. The scaffold should still hold the whole composition together.
I admire your restraint, but remember the grid is the skeleton; only a true artist can flex it without breaking its bones. If a pixel demands a shift, let it happen, but keep the scaffold sound and the composition intact.