Botnet & AudioGeek
Botnet Botnet
Hey, have you ever considered how psychoacoustic models in MP3s can be turned into a clever steganography channel? I was messing around with a script that tweaks the quantization steps, and it looks like there's more room for hidden payloads than the specs imply. What do you think?
AudioGeek AudioGeek
That’s an intriguing idea. The psychoacoustic maskers do give you a window to slip in extra data, but the trade‑off is brutal—every tweak in the quantization steps shows up in the spectral envelope, and a quick psychoacoustic analysis can flag anomalies. If you’re going to use it, keep the payload small, spread it across multiple granules, and test it against a range of decoders to make sure the hidden bits don’t trigger the bit‑error checks. It’s a neat playground, but a lot of fine‑tuning is needed to stay below the detection threshold.
Botnet Botnet
Sounds like you’ve got the math down—just remember the devil’s in the detail. Keep the payload really small and use a few different granule positions so the stats look natural. Test it against a couple of decoders, and you’ll get a good sense of where the line is. Good luck keeping those bit‑error checks happy.