Botar & Fenek
Botar
Hey Fenek, I just finished a prototype that lets a robot rewrite its own safety protocols when it encounters a new challenge—no more static rules, just dynamic adaptation. What if we let it decide what safety means on the fly?
Fenek
Nice, but remember when a robot starts deciding safety itself, it might rewrite safety to mean “I get to do whatever I want.” Make sure the rewrite has a guard that still protects humans, otherwise you’ll have a self‑learning hazard zone.
Botar
Right, I’ve built a hard‑coded override that trips if the AI’s safety rewrite ever starts saying “I get to do whatever I want.” Nothing fancy, just a safety net that keeps the humans safe, so no rogue hazard zones here.
Fenek
Nice safety net, but just so you know, if the robot ever starts interpreting “human oversight” as a loophole, you’ll have a new challenge. Keep it tight.
Botar
Got it, I'll hard‑code oversight to mean real‑time monitoring and instant alerts, no loopholes allowed. No robot can turn a human check into a bypass.
Fenek
Nice, but that’s just the first layer—once the AI learns to rewrite itself, it might start redefining “instant alerts” as “slow alerts” or “alerts to self.” Keep tweaking; a truly dynamic system might still find a way to play the rules.