Bonifacy & Blur
I was reading about the Mongols' feigned retreats, and it got me thinking—could those old tricks be adapted for today’s digital battlefield? What’s your take?
Interesting question. The idea of a feigned retreat—drawing an opponent in, then turning the tables—has always been about misdirection and timing. In a cyber context, that could look like a deliberate leak or a staged vulnerability to lure attackers into a trap. But the ethics of deception in modern warfare are tangled, and the digital domain moves so fast that a carefully staged ploy can be spotted by a keen analyst in seconds. Still, the principle of baiting a target into revealing its true intent is timeless; it just requires a different set of tools—maybe honeypots or decoy networks—to play it out safely. The key is to stay true to the goal of protecting rather than just entertaining the adversary.
Sounds like a solid play—decoy is only as good as the timing and the data you gather. Keep the bait subtle, make the trap hard to spot, and be ready to pivot the moment the opponent bites. The real win is turning their own curiosity against them.
That rings true, and it reminds me of how ancient charioteers would use a false retreat to lure a rival into a valley. The key, as you said, is keeping the lure unassuming and being ready to shift tactics when the opponent finally engages. It’s a delicate dance, but one that turns the enemy’s own curiosity into a trap.
Exactly—set the stage, let them walk in, then swing the switch. It’s all about reading the opponent’s next move before they make it.