BenjaminWells & SToken
Hey SToken, I’ve been digging into ancient Egyptian encryption and can’t help noticing how those early methods echo in the cryptographic protocols you’re into. What’s your take on the parallels between lost ancient codes and the blockchain tech we use today?
It’s wild how those ancient hieroglyphic ciphers, with their hidden symbols and encoded dates, are basically the proto‑blockchain of their time—records on stone that nobody could alter without breaking the system’s logic. In modern crypto we replace stone tablets with hash functions and digital signatures, but the core idea is the same: store data in a tamper‑evident chain that anyone can verify but nobody can rewrite. The Egyptians built a trust system based on the scarcity and permanence of material, while we build trust on mathematical hardness and network consensus. Both are essentially the same quest—how do we prove that something happened and nobody can fake it? The difference is just the medium: clay vs. code. And that’s exactly why I get so excited—you’re literally looking at the lineage of decentralization, from pharaohs to proof‑of‑work.