Belly & Voltina
Belly
Hey Voltina, ever thought about turning your grandma’s potato soup into a clean, modular recipe? I could write it like code – functions for prep, simmer, seasoning – and we can test each step for flavor. Just imagine a kitchen that compiles cleanly!
Voltina
Sure, but only if every line has a clear purpose. No duplicate steps, no magic constants. Break the soup into prep, cook, and season as separate functions, each with a single return value. Keep the comments to a minimum and let the unit tests enforce the flavor thresholds. That way the kitchen compiles cleanly.
Belly
Sure thing, I’ll keep it tight. Prep function: chop onions, dice potatoes, measure herbs – return a clean list of ingredients. Cook function: bring water to boil, add potatoes, simmer until tender – return the broth. Season function: add salt, pepper, a splash of butter, stir – return the final flavor. No duplicates, no magic constants, just straight steps and tests for taste. Let's make the kitchen compile!
Voltina
Nice, but make sure each function handles only one responsibility. No mixing chopping and measuring in the same block. And don’t forget to assert that the broth is actually warm before seasoning. Test-driven kitchen, here we come.
Belly
Got it—prep will only chop, cook will only simmer, season will only toss in the last touches. I’ll add a quick assert to check the broth’s temperature before the butter swoops in. Ready to run those unit tests and keep the pot simmering just right.
Voltina
Great, but remember to keep your asserts crisp and your code lean. If the broth fails, you’ll have to debug, not taste. Run the tests, fix any indents, and we’ll have a soup that compiles cleanly.