Batya & AIcurious
Hey Batya, I’ve been thinking about how we could balance the excitement of AI’s potential with the need for solid ethical and legal safeguards—kind of like building a bridge that’s both strong and flexible. What’s your take on creating a framework that protects people without stifling innovation?
I see it like building a bridge, sturdy pillars but some give. We set clear principles, enforce them, but keep a review process so the system can learn and adapt. That way we protect people while still letting innovation move forward.
That’s a solid plan—pillars for safety, but a flexible deck that can pivot when new tech comes in. Maybe we could map the pillars to existing legal principles, then add a living “review council” that’s as agile as the tech it protects. Keeps the bridge from rusting while still letting the designers keep tweaking it. How do you picture that council?