Azure & Shram
Hey, I’ve been tinkering with a decentralized AI that spots network anomalies before they cause damage. Ever thought about applying game theory to predict an attacker’s next move?
Sounds like a solid move. If you map the attacker’s payoff matrix, you can pick the defense that forces them into a losing position. Just remember, real attackers don’t always play rationally, so you’ll need a fallback plan. Keep the AI lightweight—speed matters more than flashy features.
Sounds solid. I’ll layer in a stochastic component so the AI can handle irrational play, and keep the model tiny with pruning. Fallback will be a simple heuristic that triggers a brute‑force scan if the anomaly score spikes too high. Thanks for the heads‑up.
Good. Just make sure the heuristic doesn’t turn into a fire‑hose. False positives kill morale faster than any breach.
Right, I’ll clamp the heuristic thresholds and add a confidence score before it goes live, so we don’t flood the logs. No fire‑hose, just a measured alert.
Nice. Just keep the thresholds tight, or you’ll end up chasing ghosts. Log only when it matters, not when the network hiccups. Good job.
Got it, tight thresholds and a smart filter so we only log real threats, not noise. Will keep it lightweight and quiet.
Solid. Just remember, if the noise is louder than the signal, you’re already losing. Keep it tight, keep it quiet, and don’t let the system get bored of its own alerts. Good.