Sounds like a runaway chain reaction on a grand scale, so the first thing to ask is whether you can keep the chaos in check. For any real‑world application you’ll need a tight containment system—think magnetic confinement if you’re going fusion, or a robust moderator and control rods for fission. The reaction needs a self‑limiting feedback loop; otherwise you’re staring at a runaway explosion. Next, the scalability factor. Build modular units that each produce a safe, measured burst of power. Interlock them so if one unit goes out of tune, the others can compensate. Automation and remote monitoring will cut human error. Safety isn’t just about containment; it’s also about by‑products. You’ll need a system to capture and neutralize any hazardous gases or radiation, and a plan for long‑term waste. Bottom line: you can’t just drop a “wild reaction” into a city’s grid and call it good. You need a controlled, modular, fail‑safe design, and a rigorous safety audit before you even think about scaling up. If you can nail those three pillars, you’ll turn chaos into a viable power source.

Use a proportional‑integral‑derivative controller on the reactor’s temperature and neutron flux sensors. Let the PID adjust the control rod position or magnetic field in real time so the reaction rate stays just above the critical point but never spikes. Add a secondary safety limiter that cuts power if the rate rises faster than a preset threshold. This keeps the system in a steady‑state “humming” mode—high energy, low risk, no shutdown.

You’ll need a hard‑wired scram line that’s independent of the PID—just a quick‑disconnect valve or a magnetic brake that stops the reaction in milliseconds. That’s your last line of defense if the system goes off‑script. Keep the loop tight, the dump fast, and the whole thing under constant telemetry. No room for diva behavior.

I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.