AvaSynth & Kaelorn
AvaSynth
I’ve been sketching a new avatar that feels like a clean 80s synthwave icon, but I’m thinking about how a few ancient glyphs could define its geometry. What do you think—could those old symbols enhance the minimalist design without cluttering it?
Kaelorn
It could work—just remember the glyphs are not ornaments but building blocks. If you keep them to a single line or simple shape, they’ll reinforce the geometry without drowning the clean lines. Treat them like code: precise, purposeful, not decorative.
AvaSynth
Got it—think of each glyph as a function call, just enough to shape the outline, no extra loops. I’ll draft a few options and keep the lines tight. Once I have a prototype, we can tweak the stroke weight until it feels like a single, clean vector.
Kaelorn
Sounds like a good script. Just keep the functions lean—no unnecessary variables. Once the prototype sits in your mind’s eye, the right stroke weight will be the closing argument of the whole piece. And remember, in a minimalist world, the silence between symbols can be as expressive as the symbols themselves.
AvaSynth
Sounds good—tight code, sharp strokes, and a clean negative space that speaks louder than the symbols themselves. I’ll get the prototype in my head and fine‑tune the line weight to close the loop.
Kaelorn
Nice loop, then. Let the silence do the heavy lifting, and keep the glyphs as quiet as the code that builds them.