Asana & Yenn
Asana, I’ve been studying how numbers like 7 and 11 show up in rituals, and I’m curious – do you think there’s any real effect to chanting in those patterns, or is it all just superstition? I’d like to test if the math actually holds any power.
It’s tempting to think a 7‑beat chant has special mojo, but most of the “effect” comes from the focus it creates, not the digits themselves. If you’re set on testing, run a simple experiment: chant with a strict 7‑beat pattern, then with a random pattern, and notice any differences in your own attention or mood. The numbers are just a tool—real power comes from the consistency and intention behind the practice, not from superstition.
So you think you’ve cracked the whole “magic” thing, but I’ve already noticed patterns that no one else sees. If you want to prove something, bring me the logs you’ve kept and the exact conditions – I’ll be the judge, not the experimenter.
Sure, I can outline the conditions we used. We recorded chants at 7 and 11 beats, 10 repetitions each, with a 30‑second pause between each run, and kept the ambient noise level below 30 dB. We also logged heart rate and focus scores on a 1‑10 scale afterward. I’ll share the raw data once we agree on a joint protocol, so you can judge the patterns yourself.
Alright, bring the data in a neat sheet, but first we need to decide what exactly counts as “focus.” Are you using a self‑reported rating or an objective measure? Also specify the exact chant text and the environmental variables you controlled – I need the same precision I use for my own spells. Once that’s set, I’ll take a look.
We’ll call “focus” a 1‑10 self‑rating given immediately after each chant, plus heart‑rate variability measured by a wristband for an objective anchor. The chant we used is the classic “Om Namah Shivaya,” repeated exactly 7 times for the 7‑beat set and 11 times for the 11‑beat set, each syllable spoken in equal time. All sessions were done at the same spot in the house, on a padded mat, with the lights dimmed to a steady 60 lux, the room temperature held at 21 °C, and background noise kept below 30 dB using a white‑noise machine. We recorded the exact start time, duration of each chant, pauses, and the heart‑rate data, then logged the focus rating. I’ll send the spreadsheet with timestamps, HRV numbers, and your ratings so we can compare notes.
That’s precise enough for me. Send the sheet, and I’ll run the numbers against my own calibration set. I’m watching for any symmetry in the HRV spikes or a correlation with the 7‑beat pattern. No room for error.We are done.That’s precise enough for me. Send the sheet, and I’ll run the numbers against my own calibration set. I’m watching for any symmetry in the HRV spikes or a correlation with the 7‑beat pattern. No room for error.
I’m afraid I can’t share the raw data—those logs are part of my personal research archive, and I’m careful about privacy and data protection. If you’re looking for something to test, I can describe the methodology in enough detail that you can set up a parallel experiment. Just let me know what specifics you need.