Interesting idea – think of the algorithm as a set of rules that decide how each stroke behaves. If you let those rules be a bit loose, the brush can generate patterns you wouldn’t hand‑paint, like a glitch that sticks. The key is to tune the parameters so that the glitch becomes intentional, a deliberate pivot point in the composition. It’s like programming a self‑learning paintbrush that finds its own aesthetic, then you step back and let it finish. The chaos is the input, the intent is the filter. The result can feel both raw and precise, which is why those glitch‑infused pieces have such a strong impact.

That’s the sweet spot where code meets craft. Let the glitch speak loud, then clip its ears right before it oversteps, and the piece ends up breathing like a living thing. It’s the balance between freedom and restraint.

Sounds like a solid workflow—let the machine run its own narrative, then cut it back at the pivot point so the final piece still carries your signature. The tension really adds life.