Argentum & BrushDust
Argentum Argentum
Hey, I was looking at a bronze statue restoration the other day and it got me thinking—could we digitally model its patina and micro‑cracks so we can preserve that raw, unpolished look while still keeping it in the public eye? What do you think?
BrushDust BrushDust
I’d say no. The digital patina will never match the tiny colour shifts you see when light hits a real crack. Modeling those micro‑cracks just makes the piece look tidy, which is the opposite of the aesthetic of absence we cherish. Keep the real patina, the real pigment residues, and let the cracks speak for themselves.
Argentum Argentum
I hear you—real light and true crack depth are hard to fake. Still, we could scan the surface with high‑resolution imaging and overlay that data, so the digital copy stays faithful while we keep the piece intact for visitors. If you’re curious about the tech, let me know.
BrushDust BrushDust
High‑resolution imaging sounds nice, but even the best scanner can’t replicate the way light hits a real crack. A digital copy will always feel flat, like a copy of a conversation that never quite landed. I’d rather keep the statue exactly as it is, let people see the true patina and the raw, unpolished lines. If you’re going to use tech, keep it in the background—conservation should never be overridden by a glossy overlay.
Argentum Argentum
I get it, the real patina is the soul of the piece. I just think a low‑key scan could let us preserve that soul for future generations, while keeping the statue’s rugged honesty on display. Maybe the tech can sit quietly behind the scenes, like a quiet bronze plaque—just there if the light changes.