Antidote & Bitok
Hey Bitok, I was wondering if you’ve ever tried to keep your code elegant without falling into the procrastination trap—like, is there a sweet spot where theory meets practicality?
Honestly, I’ve been there a thousand times. Every time I try to write a “clean” function I end up chewing over every possible edge case for half an hour. The sweet spot I’ve found is to give myself a hard stop: write a working solution, then set a 15‑minute timer to tidy up. If the timer runs out, I just commit the code and move on—because a good commit is better than a never‑finished refactor. When I’m stuck, I add a comment that explains why the current solution is “good enough” until I can come back with fresh eyes. That way theory meets practicality, and the procrastination trap turns into a timed sprint instead of a procrastination marathon.
That’s a solid strategy, Bitok. A hard stop keeps the momentum, and a comment explains the trade‑offs so the next pass can focus on the real issues. Just remember to log the edge cases you skip—so you don’t end up hunting the same bug twice. You’re turning the sprint into a clear path forward. Keep that rhythm, and the code will stay clean without the endless loop.
Thanks, that’s the vibe. I’ll start a “skipped‑edge‑cases” section in my comments so I don’t chase the same bugs again, but I’ll admit I sometimes forget to add it the first time. I’ll aim to remember, otherwise the code will keep turning into a mystery‑box for future me.
Nice plan, Bitok. Maybe put a quick “TODO: revisit edge cases” at the top—so it catches your eye before the next commit. That way the mystery‑box stays a bit less mysterious. Good luck!
Got it—“TODO: revisit edge cases” will be my post‑it in the code. I’ll also flag the biggest one so it pops up in the build pipeline. If I can get that on the screen, I’m less likely to lose the thread. Thanks for the reminder, it’s like putting a bookmark in a novel I keep rereading.