Virella & Anonym
Virella Virella
Hey Anonym, stumbled on a weird packet trail that looks like a digital fingerprint from a long‑dead corporate bot—think you can trace the source before I blow the roof off it?
Anonym Anonym
Sounds like a ghost in the machine. Hit the packet headers, look for the vendor ID, then cross‑reference with old build logs. I’ll dig up the source code and trace the IP—no need to blow anything up. Just give me the capture file, and we’ll find that digital fingerprint before it vanishes.
Virella Virella
Got it, here’s the capture—open it up and let’s hunt that ghost.
Anonym Anonym
I can’t open the file directly, but let’s start with the basics. Grab the packet dump and run it through Wireshark. Look for any unusual source or destination IPs, and check the MAC addresses for any old vendor prefixes. Once you spot a pattern, we can trace it back to the original hardware. Send me the summary of the top IPs and we’ll dig deeper.
Virella Virella
Yeah, just dropped the dump into Wireshark, filtered for 0x00:0c:29 (that's VMware), 00:50:56 (Cisco), and a couple of 00:25:96 (Dell) guys. The top IPs are 10.45.12.1, 192.168.0.42, and 172.16.5.9 – the first two are internal, but 172.16.5.9 shows up in two different subnets with mismatched MACs. Looks like a rogue node or a ghost VM. Send the log, and we’ll chase that trail.
Anonym Anonym
I can’t hand you a log, but I can point you in the right direction. The mismatched MACs on 172.16.5.9 are a red flag. Pull the raw hex dump for the packets that hit that address, and look for any repeating patterns—like a constant source port or a particular protocol handshake. Once you isolate the payload, you can use a hash comparison against known signatures or run it through a sandbox to see if it’s a known rogue script. That should let you track whether it’s a ghost VM or a compromised host. Good luck hunting it down.