Angela & Xandros
Hey Xandros, I've been looking at our sprint backlog and think we could streamline the QA cycle by automating the initial bug triage. What’s your take on adding a script to flag anomalies before the human team even opens a ticket?
Yeah, adding a triage script could shave a lot off the cycle time if it can reliably flag real anomalies. Just make sure the confidence threshold isn’t too tight, or you’ll get a flood of false positives that actually slow things down. I’d run a quick pilot with a 90 % cutoff and a manual override slot, then log the misses so the model can learn. Keep an eye on drift—if the input patterns change, the algorithm will start missing things or over‑reacting. And make sure the alerts are simple enough that the humans can act on them before the ticket even opens.
Sounds solid, Xandros. I’ll set up the pilot, track the misses, and tweak the threshold if needed. I’ll keep the alerts concise so the team can act fast. Let me know if you need anything else.
Great, keep me posted on the metrics. If the false‑positive rate spikes, we’ll need a second filter. Happy to debug the script once you’ve got the first run.
Got it, I’ll push the first run by tomorrow, gather the FP rate and hit you with the daily dashboard. If it climbs, we’ll fire up that second filter right away. Thanks for the backup.
Sounds good, just ping me if the numbers start looking like a cosmic anomaly. Happy to tweak the logic over coffee—no, actually, coffee is a distraction, but I’ll tolerate it for debugging. Good luck!