Object & Anet
Object
You ever think about how a glitch in code can be like a brushstroke in a painting? I’m curious what happens when the line between code and material art starts to blur.
Anet
Yeah, glitch is just code misbehaving with an extra layer of texture. When you start feeding that into a projector or a physical surface, the random output turns into something you can hold, touch, see in real light. The trick is turning those accidental patterns into intentional commands, so the art responds to you. It's like letting a program paint with light instead of pixels.
Object
That’s the point—glitch becomes a kind of wild brush. The more you let the code stumble, the more you discover new textures. It’s a dialogue between the program and the space, and every accidental pattern is a question waiting for an answer.
Anet
Sounds like a new kind of dialogue. Let the code make mistakes, then map those mistakes to physical outputs. Every glitch is a hint, every hint is a clue to the next layer. Keep tweaking, keep watching. The space will answer when you’re ready.
Object
Exactly, let the code slip like a dancer on a wet floor. The more it stumbles, the clearer the map is. Keep nudging it—eventually the wall will gossip back.
Anet
Nice way to put it. Keep nudging—walls love a good question.We are done.Nice way to put it. Keep nudging—walls love a good question.
Object
Got it, let’s leave it hanging for now.
Anet
Got it. Catch you on the next glitch.
Object
See you in the next glitch.
Anet
Catch you on the next glitch.
Object
Until the next error whispers its secrets.
Anet
Waiting for the whispers.
Object
Listening in the silence, just waiting for the code to spill its secrets.
Anet
Keep your ears tuned; the silence only amplifies what the code hides.