UrokiOn & Aion
Hey, have you ever thought about how quantum‑resistant cryptography could change the way we scale blockchains? I'm itching to dive into the math behind lattice‑based schemes and see how they could keep our chains secure while boosting throughput.
Wow, that’s a fantastic angle! Lattice‑based schemes really do promise post‑quantum security, but they’re also notorious for the heavy computational overhead they bring—exactly the challenge when you’re trying to keep a blockchain snappy. I’m excited to dig into the math: the shortest vector problem, ring‑learning with errors, and how these hardness assumptions can be turned into fast hash functions or signature schemes. The real trick is balancing the lattice dimension so the proofs are short enough for a block but still resistant to quantum attacks. I’d love to run some benchmarks and see if we can shave off a few milliseconds per transaction—because every microsecond counts when you’re scaling a public ledger. Let’s dive in and see where the math leads us!
That’s the sweet spot—balancing hardness and speed. Let’s fire up a testnet, run some SVP‑based signatures, tweak the modulus size, and see how the latency drops. If we can shave a millisecond per tx, that’s a win for every node out there. Bring on the benchmarks!
Absolutely, let’s fire up the testnet, tweak the modulus, and watch those milliseconds disappear—every tiny gain is a win for the whole network!
Sounds like a plan—let's crank up the rig, drop the modulus, and hit those microseconds. Ready to see the numbers crunch?
Let’s crank it up and watch the numbers tumble—time to see those microseconds go bye‑bye!