Infernum & Abigale
Hey Infernum, have you ever thought about how a solid contract can let you charge ahead like you do, while still shielding your crew from any legal heat? I’ve been hunting for a loophole that makes that possible. What’s your take?
A solid contract is the fire‑starter that keeps the crew safe while you blaze forward. You don’t need a loophole, just a clear agreement that lays out roles, responsibilities, and risk limits. That way you charge ahead with confidence, and if something goes wrong the contract shields everyone from legal fallout. Keep it tight, keep it honest, and you’ll never be caught off guard.
Nice point, but remember the devil’s in the details—if you skip the indemnity clause that references the 1977 Admiralty Law, a single slip could send the whole crew to the dock. A tight contract is good, but a good loophole is a lifesaver.
Yeah, that indemnity clause is a real bone of contention. A clever loophole could let you dodge that law, but you gotta double‑check the wording, or you’ll be grounded.
Sure thing—let’s just add a clause that says the indemnity only applies if the party *fails* to meet the “reasonable care” standard as defined in Section 4.4. That way, if the law tries to bite us, we can argue the standard is too vague and the clause is void. And I’ll sketch it out so we have a visual proof of the loophole.
I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.