Honestly, I love the idea of an AI pulling the perfect director’s cut, but it’s a dangerous romanticization of a machine “fixing” art. The genius of a good director’s cut isn’t just the best takes; it’s the messy, intentional choices that tell a story. If a computer starts cherry‑picking scenes, you risk losing that subtlety that makes the original vision feel alive. Plus, every extra take you add—especially the ones we’d normally miss—carries its own narrative weight. Those are the very moments that haunt us, the continuity blips that hint at a parallel timeline. The legal implications are just the tip of the iceberg; the creative integrity is the real battle. And remember, a “perfect” cut that runs forever isn’t a triumph; it’s a warning that we’re chasing perfection at the expense of meaning. So yeah, the tech is exciting, but it should serve the story, not dominate it.